Sorry, this is going to be another one of those cobbled together ‘recounted a somewhat interesting day I had’ blog posts. I promise I’ll try to get a more coherent program of output sometime soon, but for the moment my life’s still rather hectic (university’s utterly mad!).
The first round of excitement was a protest outside the Scottish Parliament I decided to attend, organised by the University of Edinburgh Amnesty International society. I wasn’t involved in the planning but I gather it had also been put together in less than a week which, given the result, was very impressive indeed! We were protesting against human rights abuses in Sri Lanka by the government of President Rajapaksa, specifically aimed at convincing David Cameron to raise the issue during an upcoming Commonwealth meeting hosted in Sri Lanka. This was my first proper protest and I wasn’t disappointed. We set out a fake beach for people dressed as Cameron and Rajapaksa to lay upon, wearing scarves (this is a Scottish beach), while the rest of held banners and shouted exciting protest chants. The Amnesty Facebook page has a picture of the event here! (I’m the one in the bright yellow jacket who happens to be blinking at the moment of capture).
Then, even more excitingly, we were joined by some MSPs. My political hero Patrick Harvie, co-convener of the Scottish Green Party, came out and had some pictures taken with us. Fellow Green Alison Johnstone was also there, along with Scottish National Party MSP Marco Biagi and Labour MSP Patricia Ferguson. It was thrilling to see so much support from within the political establishment; we weren’t shouting at a deaf parliament.
So that was all very fun indeed – if ‘fun’ is the right way to refer to a protest – well, it was fun! My second political event of the day was a debate on Scottish independence hosted by the university. Speaking in favour of independence was MSP Marco Biagi, whose schedule today appeared to be as busy as mine, and University of Edinburgh rector Peter McColl, representing the Green Party. Speaking against the motion was a Labour-Conservative partnership, something becoming increasingly common in Scotland, featuring Labour MP Sheila Gilmore* and Conservative MSP Gavin Brown. Not much new was raised I didn’t know previously, aside from the startling fact that Spain has suggested it would veto an independent Scotland’s membership into the EU purely to quell Catalonian aspirations. Considering this behaviour, I have every sympathy for Catalonian secessionists.
The voting was very interesting, however. The initial audience vote turned out to be –
Yes: 17 votes (21.25%)
No: 30 votes (37.5%)
Undecided: 33 votes (41.25%).
Compared to national polls the Yes/No divide was very similar but there were far many more undecided votes than I expected. Glad most people went into it with an open mind. Even more interesting was to be the post-debate results:
Yes: 36 votes** (42%)
No: 37 votes (45%)
Undecided: 9 votes (11%)
I certainly didn’t expect the Yes vote to make such progress, which was very interesting. Of course it’s worth remembering that the room had a significant number of international students in it, who I’d presume would tend to be more positive towards independence (internationalism was a central theme of the debate; I was particularly impressed by Peter McColl’s “I’m not a nationalist; I’m an internationalist” speech).
So, yeah. I really enjoyed my engagement with politics today and, in a bit of a post-political high, decided to stop putting off something I’ve been considering for a while and finally joined a political party – the Scottish Greens. I share so many views and aims with the party that it makes sense.
To many more exciting days like this!
*It’s probably a bit unfair to lump Sheila Gilmore together with the Tories, as she seems one of the more principled members of the Labour Party and earned my respect through the debate.
**I somehow got it into my head that the Yes/No final result had been 46/47, but this would have added about 20 people to the audience so I’m assuming I just misheard. The No result definitely only had a lead of one vote, either way.