State Schools Vs Private Schools

Here in Shetland, we have a surprisingly egalitarian society.  Though extremely wealthy and extremely poor people do exist, it’s never something which is displayed at the forefront of social interactions.  During high school I never even considered the wealth of my peers’ families.  I was both shocked and incredulous to discover that, in some state schools, kids can even be bullied for coming from ‘the estates’.  We do, of course, have some areas which develop a reputation for being dodgy, but this is never a prime consideration in creating social relationships.

And, quite significantly, we have no private schools.  Every child who grows up in Shetland to adulthood, as I have, will only ever have the option to experience state schools.  We use a junior-high model*, in which schools are dotted around rural areas, gradually becoming more centralised as you progress up the ladder.  There are dozens of primary schools, seven or so high schools, and two schools which offer Highers and Advanced Highers for 5th and 6th years.  Fortunately, I believe these state schools to be among the best in the country**.  We always had access to teachers, who were generally excellent; the schools were wealthy enough to provide us with all resources we needed; and everyone could expect to leave school with decent qualifications.  I have been fortunate enough to see state education at its best.

And yet, still it pales in comparison to what I hear about private schools: one-to-one tuition; studies in Latin, Greek, most sciences imaginable; after-school clubs; exceedingly high performance rates?  I’m sure private schools like to claim they have the best students, and that it’s purely coincidence that these academically ‘gifted’ young people also happen to have wealthy families.  The concept of receiving a better education if you’re ‘willing’ to pay for it is completely alien to me and, frankly, abhorrent.  I don’t wish at all to glorify private education, but they really do seem to get results.  Not just during school, but afterwards; the impression I have – perhaps wrongly – is that private schools are determined to successful alumni in all fields, and that they often achieve this.  Therefore, having a wealthier and more privileged background very probably means you yourself will lead a wealthy and privileged life.  This strikes me as utterly unfair.

But I don’t intend to lament the supposedly superior quality of private schools.   I regret nothing about my state education.  I’m confident there are infinitely more benefits from sending a child to a state school than private.  It exposes them to a variety of views and backgrounds in the natural diversity you find in all state schools.  State schools probably give students a much healthier view of themselves; that they’re neither privileged nor handicapped, but have the exact same opportunities and potentials as their peers, and any results they achieve are solely through their own effort.  Teachers will be there because they genuinely care about education and teaching, rather than simply seeking a well-paid, comfortable career.

I do recognise that many state schools across the country are of a lower standard than the education I received, which makes me very sad.  A year or so ago, a teacher told me about a school in a rough area of Aberdeen she used to work at which was clearly failing its pupils.  It’s an imperative necessity to improve the quality of such schools, to provide a free, high-standard of education for all.  We mustn’t let wealth and privilege determine the quality of a child’s education.  If I ever have children of my own, you can be quite certain that I’ll proudly enrol them into a state school.

*The council currently seeks to close many of these high schools, much to the outrage of many in these rural communities.

**They’re also among the few schools in the country to not have school uniforms.  It really shouldn’t come as a surprise that allowing more freedom of expression produces better results all round.

Advertisements

5 thoughts on “State Schools Vs Private Schools

  1. Pingback: A brief background… | myurbansugar

  2. “The concept of receiving a better education if you’re ‘willing’ to pay for it is completely alien to me and, frankly, abhorrent.”

    Right, and the concept of receiving better coffee if you’re willing to pay for it – that’s abhorrent too isn’t it?

    Someone provides you a service. The more you value that service, the more you should expect to pay for it. That’s what money is about – how much we value someone’s goods or services.

    So if paying more for superior education is abhorrent to you, then kindly go live somewhere that money doesn’t exist 🙂 I’m sure there will be someone happy to “teach” you for free (I don’t guarantee you’ll objectively gain any knowledge, but you get what you pay for!).

    • I completely disagree. Education is a right, not a commodity. It’s among the most important things we can provide to facilitate the development of the individual and society as a whole. Your ‘coffee argument’ is flawed, in that giving someone who is lucky enough to be wealthy better coffee won’t influence their opportunities, wellbeing and overall quality of life – and, most likely, the opportunities, wellbeing and quality of lives of their offspring – whereas a better education undeniably brings these benefits.

      Ach, why do we Socialists always get hammered by that “for free” argument? We believe that the population as a whole should contribute to these things through taxes. I can appreciate why you might disagree with this principle on many instances, but there is simply no argument there for education. Education is irrefutably to the benefit of everyone in a community, which any thinking person must be able to appreciate. Why should someone who could contribute to curing cancer, or produce the next literary masterpiece, or design a technological innovation to make all of our lives easier, be potentially prevented from fulfilling their potential because they’re ‘unwilling’ to (i.e. can’t) pay for it?

      If we lived in a world in which everyone was wealthy enough to make the decision as to whether to prioritise their children’s education or not, I could see your point. But by opening up a better quality of education for those who can pay for it, you’d effectively be segregating the community along the lines of wealth and, arguably, by class. I don’t understand how that could ever be desirable.

      (Thanks for commenting, though – it’s unfortunate I so drastically disagree with your points here! But I see from your profile that you describe yourself as a liberal, so I imagine we could find a fair bit of common ground on other issues).

      • I am not a liberal. I have no idea where you get that absurd idea, and I denounce your idiotic labeling of my views.

        (Nor am I a conservative, in case you were wondering).

        I support liberty, because there is no other moral position. If you do not support total liberty, then you are anti-human. And you, darling, are very well aware that you are anti-human.

        In love of liberty.
        tiffany267

    • Sorry, I assumed someone who talks about loving liberty is a liberal (to clarify, I mean liberal in the traditional sense, not the strange forms it has warped into in certain countries. But I apologise for labeling you in such a way). From reading your blog, I seem to agree with your opinions on gender, marriage equality, and state surveillance, for instance.

      Uh. If you want someone to understand your viewpoint, it’s generally a good idea not to insult them. That just creates bad feeling. You’re really not going to get very far if you label anyone who disagrees with you as ‘anti-human’. Does your version of liberty not include freedom of speech? Fair enough, you might not care about my opinions, but surely the reason for advocating your opinions on a platform such as thing is to try to sway people to your beliefs? Insulting people makes them less likely to consider your views.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s