Well, one of the world’s most unpredictable and potentially meaningless elections has now produced an unpredictable and potentially meaningless result. Hassan Rouhani is the new President of Iran (or will be upon inauguration in August), having won 50.71% of the vote and therefore avoided the need for a run-off election. I won’t dignify the results with one of my Excel Tables, but there are points worth discussing.
Firstly, out of the 6 candidates vetted for election, Rouhani is certainly the most promising. I don’t think he could be described as a reformist but he is a moderate on many issues. While his attitude towards significant issues like domestic human rights and the Syrian conflict are not likely to be much different to what has come before, there might be a shift in Iran’s willingness to negotiate over its nuclear ambitions. Rouhani has experience as a nuclear negotiator and does support seeking an end to Iran’s isolation. He has received a Western education, having studied at Glasgow Calledonian University before the 1979 revolution, which will hopefully have given him a better understanding of Western culture and value, and perhaps have exposed him to Liberal ideas. He has also been (respectfully) critical of the Iranian government in the past and apparently supported the 2009 protests. What he does or does not believe may be irrelevant, but having a high-profile figure with moderate views in such a fundamentalist government certainly won’t hurt.
The main thing I noticed was how decisive an election this was. While I believe Rouhani does genuinely have the support of the Iranian people, I can’t help wondering whether it was always Supreme Leader Khamenei’s intention to finish the election after one round. I’m not sure whether his powers extend that far, but avoiding a second round would reduce the chances of a ‘spark’ occurring which could create more mass unrest. Rouhani has a lead of over 30 percentage points – though this could be due to the vote being divided among the Conservative candidates. The reason I question the extent of Khamenei’s power is that, of all the candidates, I don’t think Rouhani would be his preferred President.
Overall, this isn’t really an election which can be analysed. As political theorist Ian Bremmer put it: “If the Iranian President actually had power, these elections would have been a game changer in the Middle East.” Significant, but also not very significant at the same time.